Now more than ever, technology is influencing the way we do business, communicate, move through and around the world, access and manage our homes, receive and administer healthcare, make purchases, secure information, and protect our most valuable property. Morrison Foerster keeps pace with this rapidly evolving landscape across our internationally recognized corporate, finance, intellectual property, and litigation practices. MoFo Tech brings together our insights relating to fields such as blockchain and distributed ledger, cloud and as-a-service technologies, driverless cars, drones, fintech, computer hardware and software, the Internet of Things, semiconductors, and telecommunications. The MoFo Tech blog offers real-time, in-depth analyses of the trends and complex issues shaping the global technology industry.<h2>ABOUT MORRISON FOERSTER</h2>Morrison Foerster is a leading global law firm that transforms complexity into advantage for its clients. Our clients include some of the largest financial institutions, banks, consulting and accounting firms, and Fortune 100, technology, and life sciences companies. Highlighting the firm’s commitment to client service, leadership in market-changing deals and impact litigation, and values-based culture, Morrison Foerster has been repeatedly recognized as one of the top 10 firms on The American Lawyer’s A-List. Year after year, the firm receives significant recognition from Chambers and The Legal 500 across their various guides, including Global, USA, Asia‑Pacific, Europe, UK, Latin America, and FinTech Legal. Our lawyers passionately care about delivering legal excellence while living our values. Morrison Foerster has a long-standing commitment to creating a culture that respects and celebrates differences, while providing an inclusive environment. The firm has achieved Mansfield Certification Plus since 2018 as a result of successfully reaching at least 30 percent women, communities of color, and LGBTQ+ lawyer representation in a notable number of current leadership roles and committees. The firm also has a long history of commitment to the community and society through providing pro bono legal services, including litigating for civil rights and civil liberties, improving public education and fostering the wellbeing of children, advocating for veterans, promoting international human rights, enforcing the right to asylum, and safeguarding the environment.

Social

Search

testimage.jpg

MoFo Tech

Scott Llewellyn’s practice focuses on complex litigation in federal and state courts around the country, with an emphasis on patent and trade secret disputes. Over the past decade, he has worked on some of the most significant, high–profile IP cases involving technology for televisions, smartphones, and self–driving cars, relying on 40 years of experience with computer hardware and software. Scott also has significant experience with business divorce cases before courts and arbitrators, involving a mix of trade secret, patent, tort, and contract claims relating to technology development and implementation.Scott also has successfully tried general commercial arbitration and agency matters, briefed and argued various appeals in federal appellate court, and tried more than 20 cases for the Denver City Attorney’s office, most of them jury trials.Scott also has an active pro bono practice, having worked on a variety of criminal and immigration appeals, and having represented Colorado criminal defense and mental health organizations in high–profile suits against the state of Colorado for violations of the constitutional rights of defendants.At MoFo, Scott serves on the board of the Morrison & Foerster Foundation. In the broader legal community, he serves on the boards of the Colorado Lawyers Committee and Drop in the Bucket (a charity that builds wells and sanitation systems in sub–Saharan Africa).After law school, Scott clerked for the Honorable Clarence A. Brimmer, District of Wyoming, and the Honorable Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Ninth Circuit. He was also previously an adjunct professor at the Georgetown University Law Center.

llewellyn_scott_blog_150x150.png

llewellyn_scott_common_640x280.jpg

llewellyn_scott_heroretina_2700x1160.jpg

llewellyn_scott_mobileretina_750x1040.jpg

llewellyn_scott_social_600x600.jpg

Partner

Scott Llewellyn’s practice involves complex litigation before state and federal courts around the country, with an emphasis on patent and trade secret disputes for high-tech companies, to which he brings more than 35 years of experience with computer hardware and software, in particular relating to the processing and transmission of audio, video, voice, and other types of data. Mr. Llewellyn has also tried commercial arbitration and agency matters; briefed and argued various appeals in federal appellate court; and tried more than 20 cases for the Denver city attorney’s office, most of them jury trials.

Scott F. Llewellyn

favicon.ico

favicon-16x16.png

favicon-32x32.png

apple-touch-icon.png

MoFo Favicons

MoFo Tech brings together legal insights and in-depth analyses on trends and complex issues shaping the global technology industry, covering fields such as blockchain and distributed ledger, cloud and SaaS technologies, driverless cars, drones, FinTech, computer hardware and software, the IoT, semiconductors, and telecommunications.

Mofo Tech testimage

Announcements

Welcome to the MoFo Tech Blog

Blog - Blog Disclaimer

Blog - Terms of Use

Blog - Privacy Policy

Blog - Attorney Advertising

morrison-foerster-blog-logo.png

Provides insights and reports on the most current class actions lawsuits and product liability issues that affect consumer-facing companies.

Class Dismissed Blog

Class Dismissed

In-depth analysis of developments and trends impacting government contracting.

Government Contract Insights Blog

Government Contract Insights

Government Contracts Insights Blog

Govcon

News and thought leadership from lawyers who are adding value to the legal profession and the communities we call home.

  External-Link

MoFo + Blog

MoFo+ Together

MoFo Tech brings together legal insights and in-depth analyses on trends and complex issues shaping the global technology industry, covering fields such as blockchain and distributed ledger, cloud and SaaS technologies, driverless cars, drones, FinTech, computer hardware and software, the IoT, semiconductors, and telecommunications.

MoFo Tech

  Linkedin

MoFo LinkedIN

MoFo Tech Blog - RSS

Stay Connected

At the Intersection of Technology, Law, and Business

At the Intersection of Technology, Law, and Business

Morrison Foerster - Footer

Blogs -  Home Button

Home

Blog - Topics

Telecommunications

Artificial Intelligence

Asia

Cloud Services + SaaS

European Union

Financings

Fintech

Hardware

Intellectual Property

Internet of Things

Litigation

Mergers + Acquisitions

Privacy + Data Security

Regulatory

Software

Tech Talks

Topics

Blog - Editors

Editors

Blog - About

About

Blog - Subscribe

Subscribe

More

Subject Matter Eligibility of AI Medical Treatments

Bipartisan Coalition Of State AGs Oppose Ten-Year AI Regulation Ban

Data Privacy at the Crossroads of AI and Life Sciences: U.S. and EU Perspectives

Patent-Eligibility Considerations & Prosecution Strategies for AI-Based Life Sciences Patent Applications

AI Transparency in Healthcare: Navigating a Changing Regulatory Landscape

Artificial intelligence (AI) has quickly become a springboard for breakthroughs in personalized medicine, enhanced medical imaging, and predictive modeling for drug development.[1] And given the role it played in two recent Nobel Prizes—one in chemistry, and the other in physics—AI appears to have an exceedingly bright future as a driver of innovation.Correspondingly, AI will likely be a central limitation in many future patent claims. New treatments should lead to new patent protections. Yet a recent Federal Circuit decision and a patent office guidance document highlight a potential continuing hurdle for patents that claim AI advances in medical treatments: a lack of patentable subject matter.Determining how to navigate this new terrain will be essential for innovators and businesses that want to protect inventive applications of AI in medical treatments. This post offers a quick guide through the relevant issues and possible solutions.Read full <a href="https://lifesciences.mofo.com/topics/sm-eligibility-of-ai-medical-treatments" target="_blank">blog post</a>.

lane_jack_blog_150x150.png

lane_jack_common_640x280.jpg

lane_jack_heroretina_2700x1160.jpg

lane_jack_mobileretina_750x1040.jpg

lane_jack_social_600x600.jpg

Associate

Jack Lane is an associate in Morrison Foerster’s Intellectual Property Litigation Group.

Jack Lane

Wagner Aeronautical, Inc. et al v. Dotzenroth 

Nevro Corp. v. Stimwave Technologies Inc. 

Iconix, Inc. v. Tokuda

Applied Materials v. Advanced Micro Fabrication Equipment

FLO Corporation v. Verified Identity Pass, Inc.

GEM Acquisition Co. v. Sorenson Group Holdings

Perlegos v. Atmel Corp.

Internal Investigation

In re Atmel Corporation Derivative Litigation

In re Ultratech, Inc. Derivative Litigation

Toshiba America Electronics Components v. Superior Court

Ramax Semiconductor, Inc. v. Seiko Epson Corp.

kuwayti_kenneth_blog_150x150.png

kuwayti_kenneth_common_640x280.jpg

kuwayti_kenneth_heroretina_2700x1160.jpg

kuwayti_kenneth_mobileretina_750x1040.jpg

kuwayti_kenneth_social_600x600.jpg

Ken has more than 25 years of experience in intellectual property and other complex, high-stakes commercial litigation and trials. His cases have involved a broad range of technology industries, inclu

Kenneth Kuwayti

Ken has more than 25 years of experience in intellectual property and other complex, high-stakes commercial litigation and trials. His cases have involved a broad range of technology industries, including software, semiconductor, Internet, and medical devices.

Kenneth A. Kuwayti

gloria_christopher_blog_150x150.png

gloria_christopher_common_640x280.jpg

gloria_christopher_heroretina_2700x1160.jpg

gloria_christopher_mobileretina_750x1040.jpg

gloria_christopher_social_600x600.jpg

Christopher Gloria is a partner in the firm’s Patent Group. Mr. Gloria’s practice concentrates on domestic and international patent prosecution, IP due diligence, and IP litigation support including patent infringement and validity determinations.

Christopher Gloria

230427-ai-image.jpg

230427-ai-image

A coalition of 40 State AGs<a href="#_ftn1" target="_self">[1]</a> sent a <a href="https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/2025.05.15-Letter-to-Congress-re-Proposed-AI-Preemption-_FINAL.pdf" target="_blank">letter</a> to Congressional leaders opposing a proposed 10-year ban on states enforcing any state law or regulation addressing artificial intelligence (“AI”). The ban was included by the House Energy and Commerce Committee as an amendment to the budget reconciliation bill. The State AGs argue that the 10-year moratorium “would be sweeping and wholly destructive of reasonable state efforts to prevent known harms associated with AI.” Specifically, they argue that the ban would eradicate any state-level framework already in place, without any regulatory scheme to replace or supplement such framework. The State AGs allege that the bill would directly harm consumers and prevent State AGs from “fulfilling their mandate to protect consumers.”   The letter also outlines legislation passed by states addressing a number of harms and risks associated with AI. The letter highlights those states that have passed a series of laws designed to protect against (1) AI generated explicit material; (2) deep fakes; (3) spam phone calls and texts; (4) AI disclosure requirements; and (5) identity protection for AI generated content. The State AGs note that these laws and regulations have been developed for years, through careful consideration and input from consumers, industry, and advocates. The State AGs also warn that unforeseeable risks associated with the technology are likely to arise in the coming years. Finally, the State AGs stress that, in the face of Congressional inaction, states are likely to be the forum for addressing the real-world harms of AI.The proposed bill faces further procedural hurdles before officially becoming a part of the budget bill and then it remains unclear whether the proposed moratorium ultimately will be enacted. And, even if enacted, it probably would be subject to a number of constitutional challenges. But the effort by the federal government to limit the role of the states with regard to AI reflects a desire to allow companies to accelerate their use of AI without having to navigate a patchwork of different state regulations. Some lawmakers have suggested that the moratorium would give Congress time and space to craft a federal framework to regulate AI. In the meantime, however, businesses should continue complying with state regulations and expect State AG enforcement in this area to continue to be a priority.  For more information on the most important and interesting developments from state attorneys general (State AGs) across the country, as well as local government agencies and legislative bodies, please read our latest edition of <a href="https://www.mofo.com/resources/insights/250603-mofos-state-local-government-enforcement-newsletter" target="_blank">MoFo’s State and Local Government Enforcement Newsletter</a>.<hr class="divider"><a href="#_ftnref1" target="_self">[1]</a> The letter was signed by the Attorneys General of California, Colorado, Tennessee, New Hampshire, Vermont, American Samoa, Arizona, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, U.S. Virgin Islands, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin.

cohen_carrie_blog_150x150.png

cohen_carrie_common_640x280.jpg

cohen_carrie_heroretina_2700x1160.jpg

cohen_carrie_mobileretina_750x1040.jpg

cohen_carrie_social_600x600.jpg

Carrie H. Cohen, partner, has deep experience in white collar defense, FCPA compliance, federal prosecutions, workplace misconduct, and securities enforcement.

Carrie H. Cohen, partner, has deep experience in white collar defense, FCPA compliance, federal prosecutions, workplace misconduct  and securities enforcement.

Carrie H. Cohen

Carrie H. Cohen | White Collar Crime + FCPA Lawyer

Carrie H. Cohen has a distinguished record of success in the courtroom handling high‑stakes litigation, with a particular focus on white-collar and securities cases. She is the co-chair of the Women’s Strategy Committee.

Carrie Cohen

In re Lumber Liquidators Chinese Laminate Litigation

Maxus Energy Corporation

In re Hydroxycut Personal Injury and Class Action Litigation

Los Angeles World Airport (LAWA)

Environmental Law Foundation v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Corp., et al

Fitbit Force Recall 

People of the State of California v. The Coca-Cola Company

Seagate Technology LLC

Clif Bar, Inc.

tarantino_william_blog_150x150.png

tarantino_william_common_640x280.jpg

tarantino_william_heroretina_2700x1160.jpg

tarantino_william_mobileretina_750x1040.jpg

tarantino_william_social_600x600.jpg

Drawing on his considerable experience in environmental health, William (Bill) focuses his practice on environmental and consumer protection law, with an emphasis on climate-related goals and claims, hazardous substances, mass torts, and consumer product safety.

William Tarantino

Drawing on his considerable experience in environmental health, William (Bill) focuses his practice on environmental and consumer protection law, with an emphasis on hazardous substances, mass torts, and consumer product safety.

William F. Tarantino

waldmannagarwal_marian_blog_150x150.png

waldmannagarwal_marian_common_640x280.jpg

waldmannagarwal_marian_heroretina_2700x1160.jpg

waldmannagarwal_marian_mobileretina_750x1040.jpg

waldmannagarwal_marian_social_600x600.jpg

Marian Waldmann Agarwal is a partner in the Privacy + Data Security Group at Morrison Foerster. She also co-leads the firm’s Artificial Intelligence Group and is a member of the global Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Steering Committee.

Marian Waldmann Agarwal

Marian A. Waldmann Agarwal

crespo_melissa_blog_150x150.png

crespo_melissa_common_640x280.jpg

crespo_melissa_heroretina_2700x1160.jpg

crespo_melissa_mobileretina_750x1040.jpg

crespo_melissa_social_600x600.jpg

Melissa Crespo helps clients navigate a wide range of challenging privacy compliance and data security matters with a focus on the health information and the health care sector.

Melissa M. Crespo

Melissa Crespo

rome_cb_blog_150x150.png

rome_cb_common_640x280.jpg

rome_cb_heroretina_2700x1160.jpg

rome_cb_mobileretina_750x1040.jpg

rome_cb_social_600x600.jpg

C.B. Rome is an associate in Morrison Foerster’s Litigation Department, based in the Los Angeles office.

C.B. Rome

wang_katherine_blog_150x150.png

wang_katherine_common_640x280.jpg

wang_katherine_heroretina_2700x1160.jpg

wang_katherine_mobileretina_750x1040.jpg

wang_katherine_social_600x600.jpg

Katherine Wang

mofo-tech-blog-image-16.jpg

Bipartisan Coalition Of State AGs Oppose Ten-Year AI Regulation Ban

Japan: Privacy Updates on Handling Personal Information in the “Digital Market”

mofo-tech-blog-image-16

AI is transforming the life sciences industry by accelerating drug discovery and personalizing patient care. But as companies increasingly rely on AI to process genetic, biometric, and other types of health data, they must also comply with a constantly evolving data privacy, security, and AI regulatory landscape. In this blog post, we consider how several key data privacy, security, and AI principles impact the use of AI in life sciences.Read the full <a href="https://lifesciences.mofo.com/topics/data-privacy-at-the-crossroads-of-ai-and-life-sciences-u-s-and-eu-perspectives" target="_blank">blog post</a>.

storm_marijn_blog_150x150.png

storm_marijn_common_640x280.jpg

storm_marijn_heroretina_2700x1160.jpg

storm_marijn_mobileretina_750x1040.jpg

storm_marijn_social_600x600.jpg

Marijn Storm specializes on the intersection of law and technology, with a focus on cutting-edge technologies, such as (generative) artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models, ethical tech, and biometrics. 

Marijn Storm

fattal_josh_blog_150x150.png

fattal_josh_common_640x280.jpg

fattal_josh_heroretina_2700x1160.jpg

fattal_josh_mobileretina_750x1040.jpg

fattal_josh_social_600x600.jpg

Joshua R. Fattal is an associate in Morrison Foerster’s Privacy + Data Security Group. He advises clients across industries on data protection best practices, product development, complex national and international regulatory compliance, transaction diligence, incident preparedness and response, and emerging topics, such as the use of artificial intelligence (AI).

Joshua R. Fattal

Joshua Fattal

230124-fda-covid.jpg

Data Privacy at the Crossroads of AI and Life Sciences: U.S. and EU Perspectives